The consensus was economic nonsense, but ideological cover for attacking the last vestiges of public ownership (e.g. Royal Mail, the NHS and education) and the welfare state.
Finally, this consensus seems to be crumbling. The TUC in September highlighted the unions' opposition to cuts, and the pamphlet published by the PCS union 'There is an Alternative' probably the most articulate destruction of the cuts consensus. Tens of thousands of copies have been distributed at the TUC and party conferences, to PCS activists, and to the wider movement. Tax justice campaigner Richard Murphy said of it "This is very good, from PCS. I know because people in the Treasury told me so."
Following on from the TUC, the Labour Party's new leader Ed Miliband used his first speech to chart a different course from the Darling-Brown axis (which was championed by the defeated David Miliband). The excerpts are below - it's not quite earned him an invite to LEAP, but it does represent a shift in direction:
Economics teaches us that at a time of recession governments run up deficits.
We were too exposed to financial services as an economy so the impact of the crash on the public finances was deeper on us than on others.
We should take responsibility for not building a more resilient economy.
But what we should not do as a country is make a bad situation worse by embarking on deficit reduction at a pace and in a way that endangers our recovery.
The starting point for a responsible plan is to halve the deficit over four years, but growth is our priority and we must remain vigilant against a downturn.
You see, it's obvious really, when you cancel thousands of new school buildings at a stroke, it isn't just bad for our kids, it's bad for construction companies at a time when their order books are empty.
It's not responsible, it's irresponsible.
When you deprive Sheffield Forgemasters of a loan, a loan from which government would be paid back, you deprive Britain of the ability to lead the world in new technology.
It's not responsible, it's irresponsible. And we should say so.
And when you reduce your economic policy simply to deficit reduction alone, you leave Britain without a plan for growth, which is what this government has done.
No plan for growth means no credible plan for deficit reduction.
Ed Balls, who to be fair was heading in this direction earlier, used his speech to Labour Party conference to say we had to "put growth and jobs first" and he reminded delegates that Ramsay MacDonald had said there was no alternative to cuts (he didn't add that much of the previous new Labour government said that too and many of them have joined: Hutton, Milburn; and Mandelson offered to).
This shift in Labour policy will also be bolstered by the Guardian/ICM poll published today, which shows that "43% now saying the cuts have gone too far compared with the 37% who think the balance is right. By contrast, in July 39% thought the balance right, and 38% said too far".
Given the cuts have yet to be outlined in full until 20 October, and many of those announced have yet to impact, this should be a worrying trend for the coalition government.
It's up to all of us to kill off this consensus, and build the opposition. Today, there are reasons for optimism.